Share How can the city put a turn around in the middle of an active road, Willow Crescent Drive continues down into the apartment complex almost an additional half mile of county owned road? on Facebook
Share How can the city put a turn around in the middle of an active road, Willow Crescent Drive continues down into the apartment complex almost an additional half mile of county owned road? on Linkedin
Email How can the city put a turn around in the middle of an active road, Willow Crescent Drive continues down into the apartment complex almost an additional half mile of county owned road? link
How can the city put a turn around in the middle of an active road, Willow Crescent Drive continues down into the apartment complex almost an additional half mile of county owned road?
RGANVA
asked
over 1 year ago
The city is not proposing this; it is part of the VDOT I-66 project.
Share So in the video posted about the Open House, Ms Stanford says that the bike path along I-66 will connect with the George Snyder Trail (in so many words). Why, then would the path need to be placed on the East side where everyone is against putting it, with bikers crossing at Eaton, only to have to figure out how to go back ‘up’ the east side of Rt. 123 to connect to that trail, vs. having the bike path on the east side end at the proposed new light, and bikers cross there, which is EXACTLY leading into the GS Trail? This would make bikers on the East side cross to the west side and back, which is the argument transportation is saying that would happen if it’s on the west side. This makes no sense. on Facebook
Share So in the video posted about the Open House, Ms Stanford says that the bike path along I-66 will connect with the George Snyder Trail (in so many words). Why, then would the path need to be placed on the East side where everyone is against putting it, with bikers crossing at Eaton, only to have to figure out how to go back ‘up’ the east side of Rt. 123 to connect to that trail, vs. having the bike path on the east side end at the proposed new light, and bikers cross there, which is EXACTLY leading into the GS Trail? This would make bikers on the East side cross to the west side and back, which is the argument transportation is saying that would happen if it’s on the west side. This makes no sense. on Linkedin
Email So in the video posted about the Open House, Ms Stanford says that the bike path along I-66 will connect with the George Snyder Trail (in so many words). Why, then would the path need to be placed on the East side where everyone is against putting it, with bikers crossing at Eaton, only to have to figure out how to go back ‘up’ the east side of Rt. 123 to connect to that trail, vs. having the bike path on the east side end at the proposed new light, and bikers cross there, which is EXACTLY leading into the GS Trail? This would make bikers on the East side cross to the west side and back, which is the argument transportation is saying that would happen if it’s on the west side. This makes no sense. link
So in the video posted about the Open House, Ms Stanford says that the bike path along I-66 will connect with the George Snyder Trail (in so many words). Why, then would the path need to be placed on the East side where everyone is against putting it, with bikers crossing at Eaton, only to have to figure out how to go back ‘up’ the east side of Rt. 123 to connect to that trail, vs. having the bike path on the east side end at the proposed new light, and bikers cross there, which is EXACTLY leading into the GS Trail? This would make bikers on the East side cross to the west side and back, which is the argument transportation is saying that would happen if it’s on the west side. This makes no sense.
T.R.D.
asked
over 1 year ago
In an ideal world, we’d have the shared use path (SUP) on both sides. However, right now the priority is to construct one on the west side for the reasons listed below.
• The I-66 regional SUP spur is on the west side of CBR (VDOT is unable to put the spur on the east side).
• Users wishing to access the George Snyder Trail will cross at the new signal and get on the trail. However, anyone wishing to access bike facilities south and west of that new connection would be cut off at that point.
Share Why did the City remove the political signs that residents put within their property line to educate people who transit the area about the City Plans? This is a right to Freedom of Speech that is upheld by the Supreme Court. on Facebook
Share Why did the City remove the political signs that residents put within their property line to educate people who transit the area about the City Plans? This is a right to Freedom of Speech that is upheld by the Supreme Court. on Linkedin
Email Why did the City remove the political signs that residents put within their property line to educate people who transit the area about the City Plans? This is a right to Freedom of Speech that is upheld by the Supreme Court. link
Why did the City remove the political signs that residents put within their property line to educate people who transit the area about the City Plans? This is a right to Freedom of Speech that is upheld by the Supreme Court.
FairfaxPedestrian
asked
over 1 year ago
The signs were removed by mistake. Street Division staff thought the signs were in the right-of-way, which is not permitted. The signs are being returned to the community this morning (3/8). Thank you for your patience in this matter.
Share Why are we seeing a sudden uptick in comments from neighboring county planners and connections to transportation officials? on Facebook
Share Why are we seeing a sudden uptick in comments from neighboring county planners and connections to transportation officials? on Linkedin
Email Why are we seeing a sudden uptick in comments from neighboring county planners and connections to transportation officials? link
Why are we seeing a sudden uptick in comments from neighboring county planners and connections to transportation officials?
transparency1st
asked
over 1 year ago
The intersection serves many people. We've extended outreach efforts beyond the immediate neighborhood to hear from as many users as possible. All feedback is welcome and encouraged.